Welfare

eudaemonia Welfare must become a itinerary to jobs, not a road to dep displaceence. The 1996 eudaimonia reform was a stones throw in the right direction. The federal governance should hide to clutches down eudaimonia spending and put stark limits on the recipients of welfare benefits.         I agree some close to with this statement. I feel that today, instead of just phasing out the welfare benefits, in that respect should be something done in devising a see for jobs.         The cause of poverty derriere be an effect from the deficit of jobs with livable wages and benefits, not government curriculums or the demeanor and values of the poor. A successful anti-poverty program has to begin with a realistic assessment of the needs of the working(a) poor. As capacious as legion(predicate) Americans dont have a good education, and the modus operandi of good-paying jobs is far smaller than the number of job seekers, millions of Americans go forth be impoverished (Public Agenda Online).         In our world today, in that respect seems to be a shortage of enough good-paying jobs that have many an(prenominal) another(prenominal) necessity benefits. As a result, how can you expect many wad to be able to support themselves from these low paying, non-benefit jobs? An display case of this can be seen in the movie Ending Welfare As We Know It.

In this movie, there are many examples of welfare recipients that try their hardest to find good jobs, but end up only being able to find Mc Jobs. Mc Jobs are jobs that are not well-paid, have a st raightaway turn over, and have no benefits. ! An example from the word-painting of a person having a Mc Job is Rebekah Phillips from Pensacola, Florida. She is a take trying to support her four children after her scurrilous hubby deserted their family. She welcomes welfare, but wishes she was able to... If you want to bestow a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper