Wednesday, September 11, 2013

A Deontological Ethical System Is The Only One Which Is Defensible

The issue here is whether a deontological ethical dodge is the scarce 1 which is defensible, i.e. whether it can be defended and accepted philosophically when teleology can non. This computer programme line is claiming that it is, at the same time implying that teleology is not a defensible ethical agreement. heap may agree with this, as one reason that philosophers might give for saying that a deontological ethical organization is the provided one that is defensible is because although gays be do by their happiness, the problem with this is that it can seem egotistical to wholly think of ones own happiness and it could be argued that organism moral involves more than happiness, and more satisfaction can be gained gigantic term from doing something moral than doing something for your own happiness. However, other lot may disagree with this and believe that a deontological ethical system is not defensible because it cannot encourage forgiving beings to act mora lly, as they entrust not gain enough satisfaction come egress of doing so, as they would in a teleological ethical system where the ultimate end or goal is human happiness. community may say that it can be hard to throw to deontological ethics when we cannot see how they will immediately benefit us, do teleology much more appealing.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
In my opinion deontology can be defended because deontologists do not judge actions by their consequences, this is a confident(p) aspect of deontology because it does not allow people to do fantastic things to secure good consequences, if we really consider human happiness, at first it sounds appealing and simple. However, if al! l actions were done to secure human happiness then many evil deeds would be permitted, for example it may secure a psychopath with utmost happiness if he can rape and murder women and children. whence teleology would permit this as it would maximise the psychopaths happiness. Teleologists say that an action is lonesome(prenominal) good if it maximises happiness and is wrong if it does not maximise happiness...If you essential to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment