.

Sunday, September 22, 2013

Article Analysis

I read an article some a vulgarise who “jailed kids for cash” spring chickenfully and I was quite operateivated after reading the story. I also had a analogous reaction after I read Chapter 21 well-nigh the Gault decision. two the chapter in the book and the article in CNN ar shockingly similar in that the justice system seemed to run off and was seen as unconstitutional once again, which is disheartening because angiotensin-converting enzyme fortune occurred more than forty years ago foregoing to the recent case cited in the article. Both gauges involved profaned the seventh Amendment, which states, “no inhumane or unusual punishments” (305). Philip Swartley, 14, act an offense when he pocketed money from a car in the neighborhood to buy snacks. When the cops caught him, he was sent to court. His mother did non conjecture she needed an attorney for his offense because she thought he would prepare away with a fine and community serv ice. However, she was blow forth of the water to find out that he would be sentenced to a youth detention center and so would have to go to boarding school for “troubled” teens months after. What seemed strange about the finding of fact was how the judge gave such a harsh punishment to Philip change surface though his offense seemed minor just like the Gault case. The 7th Amendment seems to be broken because the punishment given did seem cruel and unusual.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
In the Gault case, the Bill of Rights and specific clauses from the Constitution were reviewed because of an unfair exam involving a boy named Gerald for making prank calls. Gerald “was que! stioned for the lewd knell calls he had allegedly made without advising him of a right of a counseling to help him” (311). Without much of a defense, the judge then gratingly sentenced him six months in a State industrial School. Both Gerald and Philip’s cases seem very similar because both children were “ take of due process of law by being denied able notice, record of proceedings and right to counsel” (312). Unlike...If you penury to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment