I have always hated standardized streaks. Sure, in that respect argon many different types of standardized streamlets. The SAT, the ACT that ar devoted to every last(predicate) students and the numerous AP exams that are prepared with a more exclusive audience in mind. But theyre every basically flawed. The point of a standardized test, as around as I can figure it out, is to give colleges, political science officials, and likely employers an idea of what sort of person they are traffic with. That is elegant; there arent many ways to evaluate large-scale numbers racket of people quickly without resorting to some trope of prepackaged sets of questions to be answered in a structured put in provided a few short hours. And if everyone who dealt with standardized tests established this, and knew that they were a best rough approximations of the truth, I would not be make-up this essay. (Well, I still might, because I have a interpersonal chemistry midterm that I am pu t off, but I digress...) However, teachers, schools, politicians and employers alike generally share the assurance that tests are furthest more important than they really are, and entrust that they can check off enough about a person by how closely they play the game of the test maker.
This is dangerous, because some people are very good at manipulating the system, or serveing others to (and all for a fee, of course, which is doubly dangerous out-of-pocket to its inherent discrimination). chalk up to that the number of computer programs create verbally and books published solely to help a student fix a higher score, and the proliferation of supposedly college-! level AP classes structured and taught for the test and for the test only and with only move consideration for how a render might be taught for its consume intrinsic merit, and it is evident that... If you necessity to get a expert essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper