College Admissions And Affirmative Action

Regents of the University of atomic number 20 V . BakkeAllan Bakke was a thirty-five-year-old fresh man who had custom twice to the health check take conduct at University Of atomic number 20 , Davis . He was non authentic either time . Bakke discovered that the educate had sixteen places silent in each class for adept hundred dependant minorities . The reserved slots were part of the university s plausive effect program Bakke s college grade point sightly and his test scores were higher than either of the minority students admitted in the years that Bakke was rejected . Bakke contended that he was denied entree based on campaign . Bakke contended his view in some(prenominal) the calcium courts and the Supreme rustle . The Supreme tribunal considered the followingDid the University of California violate the 14t h Amendment s em dust tribute cla work , and the civilian Rights set of 1964 , by practicing an affirmative action policy that resulted in the repeated rejection of Bakke s application for access to its medical school (OyezIn Regents of the University of California V . Bakke , they were unable to slip by a majority faith . Four of the justices agree that whatsoever quota system based on race (especially when encouraged by the government ) violated the well-behaved Rights Act of 1964 . Justice Lewis F Powell , Jr . cast the deciding voter turnout which ed the medical school to admit Bakke . He too argued that the rigid use of goods and services of racial quotas violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . The remaining justices held that racial quotas are permissable . Powell agreed with that opinion as well , privded that the use of race was apply as champion of several admission criteria rather than the touch on criteriaGrutter v . BollingerBarb ara Grutter , a white Michigan resident , e! mploy to jurisprudence school at the University of Michigan . She applied with a 3 .8 GPA and an LSAT score of 161 (scores range from 120 to clxxx , and the average score is 150 , but Grutter was not admitted .

The school admitted that it uses race as a factor in do admissions decisions in to maintain sort among the student body . The territory Court decided that the school s interest in maintaining revolution in the student body was not sufficient . The Court of Appeals reverse the decision , holding that Justice Powell s opinion in Regents of the University of California v Bakke , 438 U .S . 265 (1978 , pro vided a precedent establishing diversity as a governmental interest which is enough to release the use of racial quotas in the admission process . The hesitancy at hand wasDoes the University of Michigan fairness School s use of racial preferences in student admissions violate the Equal testimonial article of the Fourteenth Amendment or Title VI of the elegant Rights Act of 1964 (OyezThe 5-4 opinion held that the Equal Protection Clause does not abrogate the school from considering race their admissions decisions , as long as it is apply to further the educational benefits that flow from a several(a) student body . The Court further reasoned that , because the Law School reviews...If you deficiency to get a full essay, graze it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper