Ode on a Grecian Urn and Ode to a Nightingale analysis. Both by John Keats

Ode on a Grecian Urn and to a Nightingale Ode on a Grecian Urn draws out two different emotions. Firstly, blessedness is drawn out, mostly due to the fact that Keats uses the word well-chosen so many times. Upon reading the song again I invent hints of sadness when examining the urn. The beginning of the poem is one of bliss and marvel as Keats asks what men or gods be these, referring to the figures on the placement of the urn. Keats seems intrigued by the beauty of the urn and how of all timeything on the urn may make pass entirely is ceaselessly imprinted on the human face. But when reading the poem over I see a different side of the poem. I imagine that Keats is second guessing the blessing of universe unendingized on the urn. The forever figures on the urn be just a tragic varan of glorious times passed that may never be seen again. As in lines 36-40 in which Keats states that citadels are emptied of people, streets are empty and unruffled and no one provide ever return. Another disappoint setback of the immortality of the urn is its repetition. Being imprinted with paint on the side of the urn in paint gives no life to the figures. They are confine in the position for all eternity with no capabilities. Who would want an immortal life with the curse of being trapped when one could life a mortal life dear of free will, and excerpt making? Line 17 speaks of a lover who can not kiss his partner because he is stuck in position. Ode to a Nightingale is a tough poem to read. Keats is somehow thinned by the song that gives him pleasure. Keats may be jealous of the nightingale, possibly of the simplicity of... If you want to get a full essay, baffle it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper